29 February 2012
FD2What Ads and Commercials Really Do
For the growing advertising and commercial industries that are worth more than 300 billion U.S. dollars in America alone, people are daily confronted with numerous and diversify ads and commercials whether voluntarily or obligatedly. Therefore, people are more or less but definitely impacted by what they see so constantly. [THESIS] However, ads and commercials do not have negative impacts on viewers mainly because the lack of personal connection and consumers’ belief, and in some cases, ads and commercials even have positive effects [THESIS].
A Toshiba commercial has really caught my attention recently. A group of engineers are discussing their new finished laptop. The female engineer confirms with their CEO that if their new laptop does not need the impact smart hard drive, they can ship the new product line on that day. The CEO then thinks in his head a sequence of events that may happen if their new laptop did not come with the impact smart hard drive: If an electrician dropped that Toshiba laptop which was used to operate an electric line, the laptop then automatically shut down the whole U.S.’s electrical system. Nine days later at a random house, a guy drank milk from the fridge that had been out of electric. That guy turned into a zombie and bit his friend which also turned his friend into a zombie. And after all, everyone turned into zombies. Thus, the CEO decides to have an impact smart hard drive for their new laptop computer. The commercial ends with a quote from Toshiba “We thought of everything”.
This commercial is vivid examples of slippery slope fallacy, “presuming that one event will inevitably lead to a chain of other events that end in a catastrophe” (JimS, “Laulima: Logical Fallacies Exercise”). In both cases, neither the U.S. electrical system nor the world’s satellite can be absolutely shut down just because of someone’s negligence such as dropping the laptop and unplugging the satellite cord. Thus, the sequences of events that the CEO was thinking of cannot actually happen. Therefore ads and commercials viewers who are stable-minded adults cannot be convinced by such an imaginary catastrophe. In 1960 E. Jerome McCarthy, prominent marketer, stated that Product, Price, Promotions and Place are the four elements to promote a product to customers.
However, the Toshiba commercials miss out three of the four elements. First marketers fail to inform fairly about the price of the products, which makes the prospective consumers have to research it only to find out that new line of products usually cost at least a fortune. Second, since the products are first time introduced to the market, there is no promotion going on. Third, commercial viewers are not informed how and where to get the Toshiba products. Moreover, according to Pam Danziger, a consumer insights expert and author of several marketing books such as Shopping, Let Them Eat Cake, Why People Buy Things They Don’t Need…, putting “current and relevant consumers’ insights” is fundamental to successful marketing. Same idea was discussed in The Entrepreneur’s Guidebook Series, “most will agree that the key to understanding why people buy, and for that matter all human behavior, it to first understand what they believe in” (Understanding Human Belief, page 6). Obviously the producers made the two commercials mentioned above incredibly unbelievable. Instead of making the products compatible and connected with consumers, the commercials only bring out amusing and fictional scenarios.
Author and sociology professor Amitai Etzioni states that “It therefore seems safe to say that consumerism is, as much as anything else, responsible for the current economic mess” (“Spent: America after Consumerism”, Dialogues: An Argument Rhetoric and Reader page 309). Though consumerism is relatively accountable for people’s debts, author Etzioni fails to recall other real blames for our failing economy such as Government’s unnecessary and discretionary spending on oil wars, entitlements for former governors and presidents, and so on. The golden times were also the golden consumerism period where everyone sold and everyone bought completing the successful economic cycle.
Many may say product ads have negative impacts on innocent and unknowledgeable children. For example responding to Darian Omoto’s “Ads have a negative impact”, Taleea Carvalho shared how her eight-year-old sister got her Wuggle Pets. Carvalho’s sister saw the Wuggle Pets commercial and wanted to have one, so their parents bought a set for her. Carvalho clearly blames the commercial for her sister getting the Wuggle Pets. Nonetheless, Carvalho forgets the importance of her parents’ role in this case. I did a little research on Wuggle Pets. Their price varies from fourteen dollars to under thirty dollars which is a reasonable price for a kids’ toy set nowadays. Also, Wuggle Pets are easy to make, fun to play and safe for children to hug, kiss or sleep with. Therefore, Carvalho’s parents may have bought her sister Wuggle Pets for practical and affordable reasons. Carvalho’s statement is flawed because of it is stacking the deck meaning when “writers give only the evidence that supports their premise, while disregarding or withholding contrary evidence” (JimS, “Laulima: Logical Fallacies Exercise”). Considering all the children’s toys in general, parents can decide whether the toys are reasonably-priced and educational for their kids. It might get really tough the first time kids get refused, but repeatedly they will built an understanding that their parents will give them what is truly good for them.
In contrast with the wrongful idea that ads and commercial ultimately have negative impacts on us, Alexandra Foster asserted “There are plenty of times that ads promote and inform us of products and messages that are valuable and important” (Laulima Discussion). I absolutely agree with Foster’s statement. For instance, spring time is the tax season, so we see lots of commercials from H&R Block or Turbo Tax about helping people file tax for free with the form 1040EZ. As we drive on the freeways, ride the bus or walk along the parks, we often see several ads with great contents such as “Meth – Not Even Once” teaches young adults the horrifying results of doing meth , “Click It or Ticket” encourages people to wear their seatbelts, “University of West Oahu”: give students information about school options and career pathways. All of these ads and commercials are absolutely comprehensive, educational and informative.
As the TV goes on 24/7, no one can stop producers from making ads and commercials or playing them so constantly. Most of the times, ads and commercials play their parts as entertaining shows between other shows. Other times, ads and commercials just cannot create a link and earn fair trust from their viewers. Therefore, ads and commercial do not have negative impact on people, but even have positive ones.
Works Cited
Calvaho, Taleea. Laulima Discussion Comment. 14 Feb 2012. “Yes, ads have a negative impact” Darian Omoto. English 215W Laulima. 20 Feb 2012. [https://laulima.hawaii.edu].
Danziger, Pam. “My new book -- Putting the Luxe Back into Luxury -- is out”. Why People Buy. n.d. Unity Marketing. 24 Jan 2012. [http://www.whypeoplebuy.com/]
Etzioni, Amitai. “Spent: America after Consumerism”. Dialogues: An Argument Rhetoric and Reader. 7th edition. Eds. Gary Goshgarian and Kathleen Krueger. New York: Pearson-Longman, 2011. 308-313.Foster, Alexandra. “No, ads don't have a negative impact”. Online Posting. 14 Feb 2012. Laulima Discussion. 29 Feb 2012. [https://laulima.hawaii.edu].
Shimabukuro, Jim. “Laulima: Logical Fallacies Exercise”. Jim’s Course Resources. 8 Jan 2012. English 215. 10 Feb 2012. [http://eng215kcc.wordpress.com/2009/09/22/laulima-logical-fallacies-exercise/]
“Understanding Human Beliefs”. The Entrepreneur’s Guidebook Series. n.d. Patsula Media, 2007. 6. [http://www.patsula.com/books/gb46.pdf]
Log of Completed Activities
_x__ Feb. 6- Intro to Paper #2. Read the Guidelines for Paper #2.
_x__ Feb. 10- Complete readings for paper #2.
_x__ Feb. 13- Laulima Discussion: Ad Pros and Cons
_x__ Feb. 17- Laulima Discussion: Logical Fallacies Exercise
_x__ Feb. 24- Submit RD2 [50 pts]. Review the guidelines.
_L__ Feb. 27- Submit three RD2 evaluations [50 pts]. Review the guidelines.
_x__ Mar. 1 – Submit FD2 [125 pts]. Review the guidelines.